PHO vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. PHO is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PHO returned -2.24% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

PHO vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

PHO

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 3.54%
• 6M: -5.03%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 1Y: -2.24%
• 3Y*: 7.55%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 11.61%

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHO vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF	-1.60%	7.62%	-4.82%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PHO and MSTZ is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.23

Return for Risk

PHO vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHO

PHO Risk / Return Rank: 7
PHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHO vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PHO	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	1.64	-1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	2.34	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.30	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	2.86	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	5.59	-6.08

PHO vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHO Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHO and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PHO vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHO	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.62%	-99.38%	+43.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.78%	-84.89%	+71.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.03%	-97.51%	+90.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-94.53%	+84.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.00%	43.41%	-37.41%

Volatility

PHO vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 5.38%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHO	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	56.46%	-51.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.68%	135.20%	-123.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.42%	148.41%	-132.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	171.17%	-152.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	171.17%	-151.73%

PHO vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHO vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF	0.58%	0.54%	0.45%	0.59%	0.49%	0.20%	0.39%	0.43%	0.46%	0.34%	0.47%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHO and MSTZ in my portfolio?

PHO and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHO or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to PHO (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, PHO or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs -2.24% for PHO. On fees, PHO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PHO or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs -2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PHO or MSTZ?

PHO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PHO or MSTZ?

PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between PHO and MSTZ?

PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.