PGZ vs. ATMP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PGZ (Principal Real Estate Income Fund) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 10 years, PGZ returned 4.01%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PGZ vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGZ achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PGZ has underperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 4.01%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.20% annualized return.

PGZ

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 8.40%
• 3Y*: 15.84%
• 5Y*: 2.17%
• 10Y*: 4.01%

ATMP

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 20.43%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 21.55%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGZ vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGZ Principal Real Estate Income Fund	6.74%	14.50%	17.99%	4.05%	-27.98%	38.70%	-36.50%	36.77%	3.92%	18.23%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	20.60%	1.73%	31.66%	14.51%	20.71%	33.06%	-34.39%	0.39%	-14.55%	-11.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PGZ and ATMP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between PGZ and ATMP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PGZ vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGZ

PGZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
PGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 44
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGZ vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGZ	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.31	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.87	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.23	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	2.53	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.22	5.89	-2.67

PGZ vs. ATMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the ATMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGZ and ATMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PGZ vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGZ drawdown since its inception was -53.58%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGZ and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGZ	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.58%	-80.86%	+27.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-7.30%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.56%	-16.48%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.34%	-22.98%	-12.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.58%	-75.66%	+22.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.07%	-5.61%	-3.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.12%	-31.08%	+14.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	3.13%	-0.52%

Volatility

PGZ vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Real Estate Income Fund (PGZ) is 3.05%, while Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that PGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGZ	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	5.64%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.85%	10.99%	-2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.27%	14.18%	-3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	22.25%	-7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	27.67%	-5.87%

Dividends

PGZ vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

PGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PGZ Principal Real Estate Income Fund	12.42%	12.59%	12.75%	13.33%	11.86%	6.32%	10.34%	6.25%	7.98%	9.51%	10.90%	10.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGZ and ATMP in my portfolio?

PGZ and ATMP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGZ or ATMP?

ATMP has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to PGZ (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGZ dropped -53.58% vs ATMP's -80.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.