PGRO vs. XOMO
PGRO (Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PGRO returned 9.32% vs 29.93% for XOMO. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
PGRO vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.26% return.
PGRO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 9.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.18%
XOMO
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 1Y
- 29.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.82M | $4.94M | $2.18M | |
| $613.93K | $674.71K | $709.58K |
PGRO vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 1.37% | 15.13% | 34.01% | 9.68% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.26% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGRO and XOMO is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | -0.11 |
The correlation between PGRO and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGRO vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
PGRO
XOMO
PGRO vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGRO | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.64 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 4.12 | -2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGRO vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGRO | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -18.90% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -17.25% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -7.57% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -7.50% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 6.90% | -1.38% |
Volatility
PGRO vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) is 5.72%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that PGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGRO | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 6.19% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 17.25% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 20.68% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 19.20% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 19.20% | +2.57% |
PGRO vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGRO vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XOMO's 37.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.19% | 0.12% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGRO and XOMO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOMO has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to PGRO (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.93% vs 9.32% for PGRO. On fees, PGRO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PGRO has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.93% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PGRO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.04%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.
PGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGRO and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer