PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGRO vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGRO vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 9.23% return.


PGRO

1D
-1.38%
1M
-2.70%
6M
3.64%
YTD
2.07%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.02%
6M
8.64%
YTD
9.23%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRO vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
2.07%15.13%34.01%45.19%-31.53%16.63%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.23%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%22.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and SPYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.97

The correlation between PGRO and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGRO vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGRO
SPYG

Technology

48.3%
52.0%

Communication Services

17.1%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
8.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
6.2%

Financial Services

5.4%
8.9%

Industrials

4.3%
5.2%

Utilities

2.6%
1.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.6%

Energy

-

0.1%

Technology

PGRO
48.3%
SPYG
52.0%

Communication Services

PGRO
17.1%
SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PGRO
7.8%
SPYG
8.5%

Healthcare

PGRO
7.3%
SPYG
6.2%

Financial Services

PGRO
5.4%
SPYG
8.9%

Industrials

PGRO
4.3%
SPYG
5.2%

Utilities

PGRO
2.6%
SPYG
1.2%

Basic Materials

PGRO
2.4%
SPYG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

PGRO
1.9%
SPYG
1.0%

Real Estate

PGRO
0.9%
SPYG
0.6%

Energy

PGRO

-

SPYG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGRO vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRO
PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRO vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGROSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.48

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

5.62

-3.87

PGRO vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRO and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGROSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.73%

-67.63%

+32.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-13.76%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-22.14%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.73%

-32.67%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-5.06%

-2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-24.23%

+14.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

3.61%

+1.65%

Volatility

PGRO vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 5.91% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGROSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

5.80%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

14.44%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

17.64%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

21.44%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

20.74%

+1.05%

PGRO vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGRO vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.08%0.19%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PGRO and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PGRO has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to SPYG (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 13.52% vs 10.98% for PGRO. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 10.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.

PGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGRO and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer