PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGF vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGF vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PGF has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.32%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


PGF

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.34%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
-0.72%
10Y*
2.32%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGF vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
-0.02%3.40%6.01%7.73%-19.22%2.65%7.23%14.55%-2.82%10.82%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PGF and VOO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.43

The correlation between PGF and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGF vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGF
VOO

Financial Services

100.0%
11.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

PGF
100.0%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

PGF

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

PGF

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PGF

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

PGF

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

PGF

-

VOO
3.5%

Healthcare

PGF

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

PGF

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

PGF

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

PGF

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

PGF

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGF vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGF
PGF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGF Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGF vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGFVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

2.53

-1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

3.43

-2.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

3.42

-2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.39

15.95

-13.56

PGF vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGF and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGFVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.53

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.85

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.87

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.89

-0.74

Drawdowns

PGF vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGFVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-33.99%

-41.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.69%

-8.90%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-18.69%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-24.52%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-33.99%

+5.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

0.00%

-5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-3.69%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.91%

+0.28%

Volatility

PGF vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 1.48%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGFVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.74%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

8.88%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.27%

11.78%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

16.81%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.01%

18.01%

-6.00%

PGF vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGF vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
6.31%6.30%6.24%6.15%5.95%4.68%4.91%5.14%5.73%5.32%5.92%5.68%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGF and VOO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to PGF (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 2.32% for PGF. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PGF has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.

PGF has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

PGF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGF and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer