PortfoliosLab logo
PGF vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PGF and AAPL is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

PGF vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
79.39%
7,515.44%
PGF
AAPL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PGF:

0.17

AAPL:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

PGF:

0.31

AAPL:

1.30

Omega Ratio

PGF:

1.04

AAPL:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

PGF:

0.14

AAPL:

0.78

Martin Ratio

PGF:

0.42

AAPL:

2.94

Ulcer Index

PGF:

4.05%

AAPL:

8.85%

Daily Std Dev

PGF:

10.28%

AAPL:

32.69%

Max Drawdown

PGF:

-75.69%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

PGF:

-9.16%

AAPL:

-19.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PGF has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 2.84%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.84% annualized return.


PGF

YTD

-1.05%

1M

-2.09%

6M

-5.80%

1Y

2.77%

5Y*

0.90%

10Y*

2.84%

AAPL

YTD

-16.34%

1M

-5.53%

6M

-9.36%

1Y

23.77%

5Y*

25.03%

10Y*

21.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PGF vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PGF is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PGF is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PGF is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PGF is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PGF is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PGF is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PGF vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PGF, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
PGF: 0.17
AAPL: 0.80
The chart of Sortino ratio for PGF, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PGF: 0.31
AAPL: 1.30
The chart of Omega ratio for PGF, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
PGF: 1.04
AAPL: 1.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for PGF, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
PGF: 0.14
AAPL: 0.78
The chart of Martin ratio for PGF, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
PGF: 0.42
AAPL: 2.94

The current PGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGF and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.17
0.80
PGF
AAPL

Dividends

PGF vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than AAPL's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
6.27%6.24%6.15%5.95%4.68%4.91%5.14%5.73%5.32%5.92%5.60%5.92%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.48%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

PGF vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-9.16%
-19.11%
PGF
AAPL

Volatility

PGF vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 4.44%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.44%
22.62%
PGF
AAPL