PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGF vs. PSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGF vs. PSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than PSK's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PGF has outperformed PSK with an annualized return of 2.29%, while PSK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


PGF

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
0.05%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
2.29%

PSK

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGF vs. PSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
-0.31%3.40%6.01%7.73%-19.22%2.65%7.23%14.55%-2.82%10.82%
PSK
SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF
-0.35%2.69%4.81%8.91%-18.86%1.57%6.37%17.59%-4.54%12.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PGF and PSK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2009

0.82

The correlation between PGF and PSK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGF vs. PSK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGF
PSK

Financial Services

100.0%
66.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

4.8%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

9.5%

Financial Services

PGF
100.0%
PSK
66.9%

Basic Materials

PGF

-

PSK

-

Communication Services

PGF

-

PSK
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PGF

-

PSK
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

PGF

-

PSK

-

Energy

PGF

-

PSK

-

Healthcare

PGF

-

PSK

-

Industrials

PGF

-

PSK
0.8%

Real Estate

PGF

-

PSK
4.8%

Technology

PGF

-

PSK

-

Utilities

PGF

-

PSK
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGF vs. PSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGF
PGF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGF Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PSK
PSK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGF vs. PSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGFPSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.75

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.83

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.11

1.83

+0.27

PGF vs. PSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the PSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGF and PSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGFPSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.75

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.08

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.18

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.44

-0.28

Drawdowns

PGF vs. PSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than PSK's maximum drawdown of -30.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and PSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGFPSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-30.10%

-45.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.69%

-5.50%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-10.30%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.41%

-22.23%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-30.10%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-5.76%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-3.98%

-3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.49%

-0.29%

Volatility

PGF vs. PSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 1.48%, while SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGFPSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.65%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

4.15%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

6.05%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.36%

10.72%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.00%

11.91%

+0.09%

PGF vs. PSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PSK's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGF vs. PSK - Dividend Comparison

PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than PSK's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
6.33%6.30%6.24%6.15%5.95%4.68%4.91%5.14%5.73%5.32%5.92%5.68%
PSK
SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF
7.04%6.82%6.55%6.44%6.55%5.03%5.08%5.44%6.47%6.91%5.92%5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGF and PSK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSK has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to PGF (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs PSK's -30.10%.

On 10-year performance, PGF leads with 2.29% vs 2.10% for PSK. On fees, PSK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PGF has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PGF has performed better with a 2.29% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.

PSK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 6.33% for PGF.

PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while PSK tracks PSK-US - ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed& Adjustable Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.45% for PSK.

PSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGF and PSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer