PGF vs. PSK
PGF (Invesco Financial Preferred ETF) and PSK (SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PGF tracks the Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index while PSK tracks the PSK-US - ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed& Adjustable Rate Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGF returned 2.29%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for PSK. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PSK.
Performance
PGF vs. PSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGF achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than PSK's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PGF has outperformed PSK with an annualized return of 2.29%, while PSK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.
PGF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
PSK
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
PGF vs. PSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | -0.31% | 3.40% | 6.01% | 7.73% | -19.22% | 2.65% | 7.23% | 14.55% | -2.82% | 10.82% |
PSK SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF | -0.35% | 2.69% | 4.81% | 8.91% | -18.86% | 1.57% | 6.37% | 17.59% | -4.54% | 12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGF and PSK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2009 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PGF and PSK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
PGF vs. PSK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGF
PSK
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PGF
PSK
Basic Materials
PGF
-
PSK
-
Communication Services
PGF
-
PSK
Consumer Cyclical
PGF
-
PSK
Consumer Defensive
PGF
-
PSK
-
Energy
PGF
-
PSK
-
Healthcare
PGF
-
PSK
-
Industrials
PGF
-
PSK
Real Estate
PGF
-
PSK
Technology
PGF
-
PSK
-
Utilities
PGF
-
PSK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGF vs. PSK — Risk / Return Rank
PGF
PSK
PGF vs. PSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) and SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGF | PSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.75 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.83 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 1.83 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGF | PSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.75 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.08 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.18 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.44 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
PGF vs. PSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGF drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than PSK's maximum drawdown of -30.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGF and PSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGF | PSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -30.10% | -45.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -5.50% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -10.30% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -22.23% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.92% | -30.10% | +1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -5.76% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -3.98% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.49% | -0.29% |
Volatility
PGF vs. PSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Financial Preferred ETF (PGF) is 1.48%, while SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that PGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGF | PSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.65% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | 4.15% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.28% | 6.05% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 10.72% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.00% | 11.91% | +0.09% |
PGF vs. PSK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PSK's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGF vs. PSK - Dividend Comparison
PGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than PSK's 7.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGF Invesco Financial Preferred ETF | 6.33% | 6.30% | 6.24% | 6.15% | 5.95% | 4.68% | 4.91% | 5.14% | 5.73% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 5.68% |
PSK SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF | 7.04% | 6.82% | 6.55% | 6.44% | 6.55% | 5.03% | 5.08% | 5.44% | 6.47% | 6.91% | 5.92% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGF and PSK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSK has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to PGF (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGF dropped -75.69% vs PSK's -30.10%.
On 10-year performance, PGF leads with 2.29% vs 2.10% for PSK. On fees, PSK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PGF has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PGF has performed better with a 2.29% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PGF.
PSK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 6.33% for PGF.
PGF tracks Wachovia Hybrid & Preferred Securities Financial Index, while PSK tracks PSK-US - ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed& Adjustable Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PGF and 0.45% for PSK.
PSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGF and PSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer