PFUT vs. VFMV
PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFUT returned 0.95%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for VFMV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
PFUT vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFUT achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 8.53% return.
PFUT
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
PFUT vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF | 4.40% | 2.22% | 13.60% | 29.98% | -33.60% | 0.62% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.53% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFUT and VFMV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PFUT and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
PFUT vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFUT
VFMV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PFUT
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
PFUT
VFMV
Technology
PFUT
VFMV
Healthcare
PFUT
VFMV
Financial Services
PFUT
VFMV
Utilities
PFUT
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
PFUT
VFMV
Basic Materials
PFUT
VFMV
-
Energy
PFUT
VFMV
Communication Services
PFUT
VFMV
Real Estate
PFUT
-
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFUT vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
PFUT
VFMV
PFUT vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFUT | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.18 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 8.57 | -7.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFUT | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.49 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.84 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.69 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
PFUT vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFUT drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFUT and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFUT | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -33.64% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -6.00% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -10.35% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.86% | -15.41% | -29.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -1.02% | -6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.11% | -3.64% | -17.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 1.53% | +3.61% |
Volatility
PFUT vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that PFUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFUT | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.09% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 6.30% | +6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 8.80% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 11.75% | +10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 14.25% | +7.46% |
PFUT vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFUT vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFUT and VFMV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFUT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFUT dropped -44.86% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.82% vs 0.95% for PFUT. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 0.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.
PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFUT and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer