PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BASG vs. BAIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BASG vs. BAIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BASG

1D
-1.72%
1M
7.15%
YTD
4.35%
6M
3.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAIV

1D
-0.92%
1M
2.26%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASG vs. BAIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BASG and BAIV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BASG vs. BAIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) and Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF (BAIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BASG vs. BAIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BASGBAIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.16

+0.57

Drawdowns

BASG vs. BAIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASG drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, which is greater than BAIV's maximum drawdown of -11.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASG and BAIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BASGBAIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-11.41%

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.92%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-4.26%

-1.58%

Volatility

BASG vs. BAIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BASGBAIVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

19.45%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

19.45%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

19.45%

-2.80%

BASG vs. BAIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BAIV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BASG vs. BAIV - Dividend Comparison

Neither BASG nor BAIV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BASG and BAIV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BAIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BAIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for BASG.

BASG and BAIV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BASG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BAIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for BASG and 0.60% for BAIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BASG and BAIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer