PFOE vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PFOE (Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. PFOE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

PFOE vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFOE

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: -11.50%
• YTD: -6.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFOE vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	0.20%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-0.73%

Return for Risk

PFOE vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

PFOE vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -0.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFOE	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-0.73%	-17.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.89%	-0.73%	-11.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-0.73%	-8.96%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFOE	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.75%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.75%	—	—

PFOE vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFOE vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PFOE or LRNZ?

On fees, PFOE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFOE or LRNZ?

PFOE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFOE or LRNZ?

PFOE has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between PFOE and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.68% for LRNZ.