PFOE vs. LRNZ
PFOE (Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFOE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pathfinder, while LRNZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Their -0.29 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PFOE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.
Performance
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFOE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LRNZ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.68K | $133.76K | $133.76K | |
| $315.87K | $800.41K | $1.21M |
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | -2.13% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -6.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFOE and LRNZ is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF (PFOE) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFOE drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOE and LRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFOE | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -11.91% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | -6.20% | -7.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -5.75% | -4.32% |
Volatility
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFOE | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 34.30% | -15.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 34.30% | -15.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 34.30% | -15.84% |
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFOE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFOE vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison
PFOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% |
PFOE Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFOE and LRNZ have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFOE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFOE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.
PFOE has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
PFOE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LRNZ is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Pathfinder and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PFOE and 0.68% for LRNZ.
Find the right allocation for PFOE and LRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer