PFM vs. QARP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFM returned 10.87%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFM charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.

Performance

PFM vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFM achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.

PFM

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 7.14%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 1Y: 17.83%
• 3Y*: 15.40%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

QARP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFM vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	9.94%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-1.09%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	12.78%	13.99%	18.94%	23.03%	-14.62%	31.82%	14.83%	30.70%	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PFM and QARP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018	0.88

The correlation between PFM and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFM vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFM	QARP
Technology	27.6%	23.5%
Financial Services	17.9%	12.1%
Healthcare	15.1%	13.9%
Consumer Defensive	11.1%	9.6%
Industrials	10.7%	8.5%
Energy	4.3%	5.8%
Utilities	3.9%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	9.6%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.0%
Communication Services	1.1%	11.3%

Return for Risk

PFM vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 73
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 87
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFM vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFM	QARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.38	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.34	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.43	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.46	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.24	15.38	-5.14

PFM vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFM and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFM vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFM drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFM and QARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFM	QARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.21%	-35.44%	-17.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-7.26%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.50%	-15.65%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.81%	-22.75%	+4.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-4.39%	-2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.63%	+0.11%

Volatility

PFM vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) is 2.07%, while Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that PFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFM	QARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.07%	2.76%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	8.22%	-1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	10.58%	-1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.50%	15.54%	-2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	19.55%	-4.37%

PFM vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFM has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFM vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.32%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.02%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFM and QARP in my portfolio?

PFM and QARP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFM or QARP?

QARP has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to PFM (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFM dropped -53.21% vs QARP's -35.44%.

Which ETF is better, PFM or QARP?

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 10.87% for PFM. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFM or QARP?

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFM or QARP?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFM or QARP?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

What is the main difference between PFM and QARP?

PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PFM and 0.19% for QARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.