PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QARP vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QARP vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's -0.03% return.


QARP

1D
0.52%
1M
1.69%
6M
8.81%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.16%

IWY

1D
0.85%
1M
-2.47%
6M
1.67%
YTD
-0.03%
1Y
10.78%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
18.31%
ALL TIME*
16.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$127.32M$104.93M$113.90M
$110.48K$118.49K$177.11K

QARP vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
13.09%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
-0.03%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and IWY is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.82

The correlation between QARP and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QARP vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QARP
IWY

Technology

24.1%
57.1%

Healthcare

14.0%
5.0%

Financial Services

12.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

10.5%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
7.3%

Industrials

7.9%
6.5%

Energy

6.3%
0.0%

Basic Materials

2.5%
0.1%

Utilities

1.9%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.2%

Technology

QARP
24.1%
IWY
57.1%

Healthcare

QARP
14.0%
IWY
5.0%

Financial Services

QARP
12.4%
IWY
5.0%

Communication Services

QARP
10.5%
IWY
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

QARP
9.5%
IWY
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QARP
9.4%
IWY
7.3%

Industrials

QARP
7.9%
IWY
6.5%

Energy

QARP
6.3%
IWY
0.0%

Basic Materials

QARP
2.5%
IWY
0.1%

Utilities

QARP
1.9%
IWY
1.0%

Real Estate

QARP
1.0%
IWY
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QARP vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QARP vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QARPIWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.09

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

0.52

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.08

1.50

+13.58

QARP vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QARP vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QARPIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-32.68%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-16.63%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-23.22%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-32.68%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-8.44%

+8.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.76%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

5.70%

-4.08%

Volatility

QARP vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.59%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QARPIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

6.91%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

14.24%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

17.75%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

21.81%

-6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

21.13%

-1.62%

QARP vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QARP vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than IWY's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QARP and IWY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 5-year performance, IWY leads with 12.72% vs 11.83% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.36% for IWY.

QARP is categorized as Quality Factor, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.20% for IWY.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QARP and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer