PFM vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFM returned 11.82%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PFM charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

PFM vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFM achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PFM has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.82%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFM vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	17.65%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PFM and DGRO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.95

The correlation between PFM and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFM vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFM	DGRO
Technology	24.7%	19.4%
Financial Services	18.5%	21.2%
Healthcare	14.9%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	12.0%	11.5%
Industrials	11.1%	10.8%
Energy	4.7%	5.6%
Utilities	4.2%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	5.7%
Basic Materials	3.0%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Communication Services	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

PFM vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 71
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFM vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFM	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.39	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.49	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.43	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	3.50	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	13.52	-2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFM vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFM and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFM	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.39	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.77	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.80	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.76	-0.24

Drawdowns

PFM vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFM drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFM and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFM	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.21%	-35.10%	-18.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-6.47%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.50%	-14.03%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.81%	-19.31%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.22%	-35.10%	+2.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.28%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-3.44%	-3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.67%	+0.08%

Volatility

PFM vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) is 2.04%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that PFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFM	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	2.21%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	6.91%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.47%	9.48%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	13.82%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	16.62%	-1.41%

PFM vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFM has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFM vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFM and DGRO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PFM and DGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PFM or DGRO?

DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFM dropped -53.21% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, PFM or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 11.82% for PFM. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFM or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFM or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFM or DGRO?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.33% for PFM.

What is the main difference between PFM and DGRO?

PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PFM and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.