PFFR vs. CWB
Compare and contrast key facts about InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB).
PFFR and CWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFFR is a passively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners that tracks the performance of the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2017. CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009. Both PFFR and CWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PFFR vs. CWB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFFR vs. CWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | -2.23% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 20.28% | -7.45% | 7.60% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 2.86% | 16.61% | 10.06% | 14.49% | -20.81% | 2.18% | 53.39% | 22.39% | -2.00% | 10.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than CWB's 2.86% return.
PFFR
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -3.91%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
CWB
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFFR vs. CWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CWB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFFR vs. CWB — Risk / Return Rank
PFFR
CWB
PFFR vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFR | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.50 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 2.07 | -1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 2.80 | -2.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 9.27 | -8.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFR | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.50 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.29 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.84 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFR and CWB is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFFR vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison
PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than CWB's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.40% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.63% | 1.69% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% |
Drawdowns
PFFR vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, which is greater than CWB's maximum drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and CWB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFR | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.02% | -32.06% | -20.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -7.52% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.80% | -28.41% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -4.16% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -6.22% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.27% | +0.38% |
Volatility
PFFR vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) is 3.66%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that PFFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFFR | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 6.36% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 11.48% | -5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.61% | 14.38% | -5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.38% | 12.85% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 14.33% | +6.37% |