PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFR vs. RNP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFR vs. RNP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFR achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than RNP's 5.84% return.


PFFR

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*

RNP

1D
-0.54%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.48%
1Y
-2.16%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFR vs. RNP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
0.74%5.36%7.12%21.04%-23.90%6.76%0.19%20.28%-7.45%7.82%
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
5.84%2.57%11.88%7.73%-19.95%32.84%3.31%43.14%-9.46%15.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFR and RNP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2017

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFR vs. RNP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFR
PFFR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PFFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFR Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

RNP
RNP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFR vs. RNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRRNPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.98

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

-0.18

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

-0.39

+2.22

PFFR vs. RNP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the RNP Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFR and RNP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFR vs. RNP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, smaller than the maximum RNP drawdown of -86.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and RNP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRRNPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.02%

-86.93%

+33.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-12.24%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

-19.71%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.80%

-36.19%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-5.01%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-13.10%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

5.52%

-2.65%

Volatility

PFFR vs. RNP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) is 1.65%, while Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc. (RNP) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that PFFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRRNPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

5.25%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

10.36%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.85%

13.32%

-5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

20.84%

-10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

24.26%

-3.79%

Dividends

PFFR vs. RNP - Dividend Comparison

PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, more than RNP's 8.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFR
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
8.37%7.99%7.78%7.72%8.60%6.08%6.11%5.77%6.48%6.59%0.00%0.00%
RNP
Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund, Inc.
8.08%8.22%7.81%8.10%13.26%5.20%6.52%6.25%8.36%7.00%7.75%8.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFR and RNP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNP has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to PFFR (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFR dropped -53.02% vs RNP's -86.93%.

PFFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFR and RNP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer