PFFD vs. PAVE
PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFFD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFD returned -0.16%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFFD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
PFFD vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
PFFD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
PFFD vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.29% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.85% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFD and PAVE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PFFD and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PFFD vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFD
PAVE
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
PFFD
PAVE
-
Utilities
PFFD
PAVE
Technology
PFFD
PAVE
Industrials
PFFD
PAVE
Communication Services
PFFD
PAVE
-
Real Estate
PFFD
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
PFFD
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
PFFD
PAVE
-
Healthcare
PFFD
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
PFFD
-
PAVE
Energy
PFFD
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFD vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
PFFD
PAVE
PFFD vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.13 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 11.50 | -7.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.99 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.81 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.68 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
PFFD vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -44.08% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -11.91% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | -26.23% | +15.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -26.23% | +1.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.82% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -6.24% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.24% | -1.23% |
Volatility
PFFD vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) is 2.09%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that PFFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFD | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 6.42% | -4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 15.17% | -9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.19% | 18.84% | -11.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.98% | 21.60% | -10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 24.38% | -11.62% |
PFFD vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFD vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.37% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFD and PAVE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to PFFD (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PFFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.
PFFD is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFD and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer