PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed PIE with an annualized return of 9.46%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%

PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEZ vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and PIE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

0.54

The correlation between PEZ and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEZ vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
PIE

Consumer Cyclical

66.0%
1.3%

Communication Services

11.9%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
0.4%

Healthcare

6.9%
5.1%

Technology

4.0%
47.0%

Industrials

3.8%
16.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.6%
14.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Energy

-

5.4%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
66.0%
PIE
1.3%

Communication Services

PEZ
11.9%
PIE
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
8.7%
PIE
0.4%

Healthcare

PEZ
6.9%
PIE
5.1%

Technology

PEZ
4.0%
PIE
47.0%

Industrials

PEZ
3.8%
PIE
16.8%

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
PIE
3.6%

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
PIE
14.4%

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

PIE
3.2%

Energy

PEZ

-

PIE
5.4%

Utilities

PEZ

-

PIE
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEZ vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEZPIEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

3.24

-2.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

3.88

-3.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.55

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

7.18

-6.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

23.52

-22.60

PEZ vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEZPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

3.24

-2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.35

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.48

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.12

+0.20

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-72.98%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-9.87%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-28.69%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-40.32%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

-40.32%

-11.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-1.17%

-10.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-26.08%

+12.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

3.01%

+2.95%

Volatility

PEZ vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.91%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

9.00%

-4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

17.77%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

21.91%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

20.23%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

21.35%

+3.71%

PEZ vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEZ vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and PIE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.15% vs 9.46% for PEZ. On fees, PEZ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEZ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer