PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. IXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. IXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 9.57%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.45% annualized return.


PEZ

1D
0.17%
1M
0.32%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
9.57%
ALL TIME*
7.88%

IXN

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.80%
6M
24.00%
YTD
26.51%
1Y
42.54%
3Y*
28.76%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
23.45%
ALL TIME*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.45M$52.86M$65.01M
$60.43K$108.59K$64.29K

PEZ vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-1.42%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
26.51%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and IXN is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between PEZ and IXN has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PEZ vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
IXN

Consumer Cyclical

70.1%

-

Communication Services

11.7%

-

Healthcare

7.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Technology

3.7%
99.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.0%

Industrials

1.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
70.1%
IXN

-

Communication Services

PEZ
11.7%
IXN

-

Healthcare

PEZ
7.3%
IXN
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
4.4%
IXN

-

Technology

PEZ
3.7%
IXN
99.4%

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
IXN
0.0%

Industrials

PEZ
1.0%
IXN
0.3%

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
IXN

-

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

IXN

-

Energy

PEZ

-

IXN
0.1%

Utilities

PEZ

-

IXN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEZ vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEZIXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.25

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

2.49

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

7.63

-7.17

PEZ vs. IXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the IXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and IXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, roughly equal to the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and IXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZIXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-55.67%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-16.09%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-25.55%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-36.30%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

-36.30%

-15.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.64%

-11.29%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-11.24%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

5.23%

+1.43%

Volatility

PEZ vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.24%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZIXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

10.37%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

23.76%

-9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.09%

27.43%

-7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.14%

25.89%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

24.88%

+0.18%

PEZ vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEZ vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than IXN's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.83%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.24%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and IXN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXN has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to PEZ (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs IXN's -55.67%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 23.45% vs 9.57% for PEZ. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 23.45% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.

PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while IXN is Technology Equities. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.46% for IXN.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and IXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer