PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.57%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.


PEZ

1D
0.17%
1M
0.32%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
9.57%
ALL TIME*
7.88%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$60.43K$108.59K$64.29K
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B

PEZ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-1.42%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and QQQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.70

The correlation between PEZ and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEZ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
QQQ

Consumer Cyclical

70.1%
10.7%

Communication Services

11.7%
13.1%

Healthcare

7.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
6.3%

Technology

3.7%
60.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Industrials

1.0%
2.7%

Financial Services

0.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
70.1%
QQQ
10.7%

Communication Services

PEZ
11.7%
QQQ
13.1%

Healthcare

PEZ
7.3%
QQQ
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
4.4%
QQQ
6.3%

Technology

PEZ
3.7%
QQQ
60.9%

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
QQQ
0.1%

Industrials

PEZ
1.0%
QQQ
2.7%

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
QQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

QQQ
1.0%

Energy

PEZ

-

QQQ
0.5%

Utilities

PEZ

-

QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEZQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

1.88

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

6.00

-5.54

PEZ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-82.97%

+24.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-11.96%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-22.77%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-35.12%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

-35.12%

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.64%

-7.69%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-32.62%

+18.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

3.74%

+2.92%

Volatility

PEZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.24%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

6.87%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

16.08%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.09%

19.38%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.14%

22.90%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

22.50%

+2.56%

PEZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.24%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to PEZ (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.44% vs 9.57% for PEZ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.44% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.

PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer