PEP vs. GIS
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — PEP in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic, GIS in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, PEP returned 6.34%/yr vs -3.08%/yr for GIS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PEP vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PEP has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 6.34%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.08% annualized return.
PEP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- -5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -26.51%
- 6M
- -25.64%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -22.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.08%
PEP vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | -0.06% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.51% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEP and GIS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 1983 | 0.41 |
The correlation between PEP and GIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PEP:
$192.87B
GIS:
$17.98B
PEP:
$6.37
GIS:
$4.08
PEP:
22.07
GIS:
8.12
PEP:
7.64
GIS:
3.50
PEP:
2.02
GIS:
0.98
PEP:
9.02
GIS:
1.92
PEP:
$95.45B
GIS:
$18.37B
PEP:
$51.60B
GIS:
$4.70B
PEP:
$15.08B
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEP vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
PEP
GIS
PEP vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEP | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.74 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.95 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | -1.94 | +3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEP | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | -1.52 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.40 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | -0.14 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
PEP vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEP | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.92% | -59.63% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | -37.97% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.17% | -55.56% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -59.63% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | -59.63% | +29.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -58.42% | +38.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.65% | -10.27% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 18.63% | -12.51% |
Volatility
PEP vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is 6.35%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that PEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEP | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 6.96% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 18.58% | -3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 23.84% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 21.13% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 22.09% | -2.42% |
Dividends
PEP vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than GIS's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.36% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4.09% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
PEP vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PEP vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PEP and GIS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to PEP (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEP dropped -73.92% vs GIS's -59.63%.
PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEP and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer