PortfoliosLab logo
PEP vs. MDLZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PEP and MDLZ is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PEP vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
447.61%
246.39%
PEP
MDLZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PEP:

-1.20

MDLZ:

-0.09

Sortino Ratio

PEP:

-1.57

MDLZ:

0.07

Omega Ratio

PEP:

0.81

MDLZ:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

PEP:

-0.78

MDLZ:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

PEP:

-1.84

MDLZ:

-0.10

Ulcer Index

PEP:

12.36%

MDLZ:

11.99%

Daily Std Dev

PEP:

19.63%

MDLZ:

20.82%

Max Drawdown

PEP:

-40.41%

MDLZ:

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

PEP:

-28.69%

MDLZ:

-9.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PEP:

$180.97B

MDLZ:

$87.79B

EPS

PEP:

$6.80

MDLZ:

$2.69

PE Ratio

PEP:

19.41

MDLZ:

25.20

PEG Ratio

PEP:

2.36

MDLZ:

4.55

PS Ratio

PEP:

1.98

MDLZ:

2.41

PB Ratio

PEP:

9.97

MDLZ:

3.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

PEP:

$91.52B

MDLZ:

$36.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PEP:

$50.10B

MDLZ:

$11.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

PEP:

$16.57B

MDLZ:

$5.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a -12.80% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PEP has underperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 6.24%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.


PEP

YTD

-12.80%

1M

-6.32%

6M

-18.46%

1Y

-23.44%

5Y*

2.54%

10Y*

6.24%

MDLZ

YTD

13.33%

1M

4.93%

6M

3.82%

1Y

-1.88%

5Y*

8.28%

10Y*

7.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PEP vs. MDLZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PEP is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PEP is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PEP is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PEP is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PEP is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PEP is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDLZ is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PEP vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PEP Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEP and MDLZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.20
-0.09
PEP
MDLZ

Dividends

PEP vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than MDLZ's 2.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
4.14%3.52%2.92%2.51%2.45%2.71%2.79%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%2.68%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.73%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%1.60%

Drawdowns

PEP vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -40.41%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and MDLZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-28.69%
-9.73%
PEP
MDLZ

Volatility

PEP vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 7.08%. This indicates that PEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.39%
7.08%
PEP
MDLZ

Financials

PEP vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
17.92B
9.31B
(PEP) Total Revenue
(MDLZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PEP vs. MDLZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PepsiCo, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
55.8%
26.1%
(PEP) Gross Margin
(MDLZ) Gross Margin
PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.99B and revenue of 17.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.8%.

MDLZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 9.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 17.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

MDLZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 680.00M and revenue of 9.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 17.92B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

MDLZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 402.00M and revenue of 9.31B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.