PEJ vs. TMH
PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - PEJ tracks the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
PEJ vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PEJ
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
TMH
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 5.61% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEJ and TMH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEJ vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
PEJ
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PEJ vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEJ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEJ vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEJ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -10.32% | -55.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -5.48% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -6.08% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility
PEJ vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEJ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 26.47% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 26.47% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 26.47% | -1.76% |
PEJ vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEJ vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than TMH's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.51% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEJ and TMH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.51% for PEJ.
PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for PEJ and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer