PEJ vs. OND
PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEJ returned 16.28%/yr vs 16.26%/yr for OND. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for OND.
Performance
PEJ vs. OND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than OND's -14.37% return.
PEJ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
OND
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -17.56%
- 1Y
- -10.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ vs. OND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 2.55% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | -3.56% |
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -14.37% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -14.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEJ and OND is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PEJ and OND shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEJ vs. OND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEJ
OND
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEJ
OND
Communication Services
PEJ
OND
Industrials
PEJ
OND
Consumer Defensive
PEJ
OND
-
Technology
PEJ
OND
Basic Materials
PEJ
-
OND
-
Energy
PEJ
-
OND
-
Financial Services
PEJ
-
OND
-
Healthcare
PEJ
-
OND
-
Real Estate
PEJ
-
OND
Utilities
PEJ
-
OND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEJ vs. OND — Risk / Return Rank
PEJ
OND
PEJ vs. OND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEJ | OND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | -0.31 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.58 | +4.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEJ | OND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | -0.51 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -0.08 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
PEJ vs. OND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than OND's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and OND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEJ | OND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -59.02% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -33.80% | +23.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.75% | -33.80% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -27.84% | +26.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -30.31% | +17.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 17.90% | -13.93% |
Volatility
PEJ vs. OND - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) at 5.33%. This indicates that PEJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEJ | OND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 5.33% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 15.36% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 20.57% | -2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 27.14% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 27.14% | -2.40% |
PEJ vs. OND - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than OND's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEJ vs. OND - Dividend Comparison
PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while OND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEJ and OND have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEJ has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to OND (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs OND's -59.02%.
On 3-year performance, PEJ leads with 16.28% vs 16.26% for OND. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEJ has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.
PEJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
PEJ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while OND is Communications Equities. PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.58% for OND.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEJ and OND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer