PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDC.TO vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
9.18%21.62%16.14%6.74%-4.34%29.91%-5.70%24.75%-12.03%10.06%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
8.37%2.57%19.64%-3.13%5.18%25.76%-2.95%16.87%2.42%6.97%
Different Trading Currencies

PDC.TO is traded in CAD, while LVHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDC.TO achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 10.43%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.


PDC.TO

1D
1.12%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
9.18%
6M
10.22%
1Y
30.92%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
10.43%

LVHD

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
8.37%
6M
4.87%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDC.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PDC.TO vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDC.TOLVHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

0.32

+2.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

0.52

+3.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.07

+0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

0.62

+3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.20

1.35

+17.85

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDC.TO and LVHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDC.TOLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

0.32

+2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.85

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.63

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.63

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between PDC.TO and LVHD is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

PDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than LVHD's 3.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.57%3.84%4.29%4.56%4.05%3.49%4.85%4.14%4.90%4.05%3.61%4.20%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.19%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%

Drawdowns

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.94%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDC.TO and LVHD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PDC.TOLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-37.32%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-8.52%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-16.75%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-37.32%

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-4.66%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-4.05%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.47%

-0.82%

Volatility

PDC.TO vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PDC.TOLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.20%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.85%

6.99%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

12.11%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

11.60%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

14.16%

+1.12%