PCLG vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

PCLG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

PCLG

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: -6.70%
• 6M: -7.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	-6.70%	-2.78%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLG and MEME is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

PCLG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCLG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	0.28	-0.92

Drawdowns

PCLG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLG	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.78%	-48.78%	+25.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.80%	-5.93%	-4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-29.90%	+20.22%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCLG	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	74.19%	-56.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.74%	74.19%	-56.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	74.19%	-56.45%

PCLG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLG and MEME in my portfolio?

PCLG and MEME have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCLG or MEME?

On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCLG or MEME?

PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCLG or MEME?

PCLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between PCLG and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Polen and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.69% for MEME.