PCLG vs. MEME
PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
PCLG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 25.81% return.
PCLG
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- -10.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME
- 1D
- -6.02%
- 1M
- -20.25%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 25.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | -10.52% | -2.59% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 25.81% | -38.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLG and MEME is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCLG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -48.78% | +25.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.45% | -33.90% | +19.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -28.48% | +18.17% |
Volatility
PCLG vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 75.54% | -57.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 75.54% | -57.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 75.54% | -57.73% |
PCLG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLG and MEME have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
PCLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: Polen and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for PCLG and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer