PCLG vs. CCOR
PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
PCLG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's 1.03% return.
PCLG
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.78K | $57.90K | $78.59K | |
| $232.64K | $284.12K | $564.55K |
PCLG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | -8.60% | -0.45% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.03% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLG and CCOR is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
PCLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CCOR
PCLG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCLG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCLG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -22.99% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.61% | -16.09% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -7.47% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility
PCLG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLG | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 8.24% | +9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 11.19% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 10.78% | +7.26% |
PCLG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than CCOR's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCLG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.04% for PCLG.
They also come from different issuers: Polen and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 1.09% for CCOR.
Find the right allocation for PCLG and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer