PCLG vs. PCGG
PCLG (Polen Focus Growth ETF) and PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while PCGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Polen. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCLG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCGG.
Performance
PCLG vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -5.56% return.
PCLG
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -5.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCGG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- -5.56%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- 1Y
- -4.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCLG vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | -5.11% | -1.09% |
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | -5.56% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLG and PCGG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCLG vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank
PCLG
PCGG
PCLG vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLG | PCGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 0.26 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
PCLG vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGG drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and PCGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLG | PCGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -22.66% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | -10.28% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -4.94% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.10% | — |
Volatility
PCLG vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCLG | PCGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 15.20% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.62% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.62% | +1.06% |
PCLG vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCLG vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison
PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PCLG and PCGG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PCLG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCLG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.
PCLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.
PCLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PCGG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PCLG and 0.85% for PCGG.
Find the right allocation for PCLG and PCGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer