PCLG vs. PCGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG).
PCLG and PCGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PCLG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Sep 29, 2025. PCGG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2023.
Performance
PCLG vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCLG vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | -17.33% | -1.09% |
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | -16.12% | -2.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCLG achieves a -17.33% return, which is significantly lower than PCGG's -16.12% return.
PCLG
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -17.33%
- 6M
- -18.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCGG
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- -16.12%
- 6M
- -18.32%
- 1Y
- -9.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCLG vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCLG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCLG vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank
PCLG
PCGG
PCLG vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCLG | PCGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.93 | -0.01 | -1.92 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCLG and PCGG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCLG vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison
PCLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.03% |
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCLG vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCLG drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGG drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLG and PCGG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCLG | PCGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -22.66% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.96% | -20.32% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.08% | -4.35% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.21% | — |
Volatility
PCLG vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCLG | PCGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 19.79% | -2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 16.64% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 16.64% | +0.74% |