PCL vs. FLTR
PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCL is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
PCL vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCL achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return.
PCL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
PCL vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 1.46% | 2.51% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCL and FLTR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCL vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PCL
FLTR
PCL vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCL | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PCL vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCL drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCL and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCL | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -17.84% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.04% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -0.67% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
PCL vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCL | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 0.79% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 2.13% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 5.00% | +2.89% |
PCL vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCL vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
PCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than FLTR's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.31% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCL and FLTR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 4.73% for FLTR.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCL and 0.14% for FLTR.
Find the right allocation for PCL and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer