PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCL vs. PFRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCL vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCL achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than PFRL's 1.96% return.


PCL

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.51%
YTD
1.46%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFRL

1D
0.09%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.91%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCL vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PCL
PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF
1.46%2.51%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
1.96%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PCL and PFRL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCL vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCL

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCL vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCL vs. PFRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLPFRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.67

-1.05

Drawdowns

PCL vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCL drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum PFRL drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCL and PFRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLPFRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-8.83%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.03%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-0.44%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

Volatility

PCL vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLPFRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.89%

1.94%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.89%

4.86%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.89%

4.86%

+3.03%

PCL vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCL vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison

PCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than PFRL's 6.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PCL
PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF
5.31%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
6.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCL and PFRL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.

PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 5.31% for PCL.

PCL is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PFRL is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCL and 0.72% for PFRL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCL and PFRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer