PCI vs. FLTR
PCI (PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCI is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
PCI vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.99% return.
PCI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
PCI vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 0.25% | 2.96% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.99% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCI and FLTR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCI vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
PCI
FLTR
PCI vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCI | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.53 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
PCI vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCI | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -17.84% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | 0.00% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -0.67% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
PCI vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCI | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 0.79% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 2.13% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 5.00% | -0.83% |
PCI vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCI vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 4.60% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCI and FLTR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCI.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.60% for PCI.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.14% for FLTR.
Find the right allocation for PCI and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer