PCI vs. PBFR
PCI (PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCI is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while PBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.
Performance
PCI vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 3.97% return.
PCI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCI vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 0.25% | 2.96% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 3.97% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCI and PBFR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCI vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
PCI
PBFR
PCI vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCI | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.49 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
PCI vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum PBFR drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and PBFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCI | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -8.50% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.69% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -0.63% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
PCI vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCI | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 4.37% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 6.90% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 6.90% | -2.73% |
PCI vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCI vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 4.60% | 2.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCI and PBFR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBFR.
PCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.
PCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PBFR is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.50% for PBFR.
Find the right allocation for PCI and PBFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer