PBUS vs. XMMO
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 13.48%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for XMMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
PBUS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
PBUS vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and XMMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PBUS and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBUS vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBUS
XMMO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBUS
XMMO
Financial Services
PBUS
XMMO
Communication Services
PBUS
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
PBUS
XMMO
Healthcare
PBUS
XMMO
Industrials
PBUS
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
PBUS
XMMO
Energy
PBUS
XMMO
Utilities
PBUS
XMMO
Real Estate
PBUS
XMMO
Basic Materials
PBUS
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
XMMO
PBUS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBUS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.45 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 18.21 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBUS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.99 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.78 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.58 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -55.37% | +22.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.34% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -24.93% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -27.91% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | 0.00% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -9.45% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.04% | -0.05% |
Volatility
PBUS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) is 2.94%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that PBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 7.82% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 15.54% | -6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 18.71% | -6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 21.45% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 22.27% | -2.94% |
PBUS vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBUS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBUS and XMMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
PBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.35% for XMMO.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer