PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBUS vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return.


PBUS

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.82%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and SPHQ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.83

The correlation between PBUS and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBUS
SPHQ

Technology

35.4%
28.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
13.3%

Communication Services

11.3%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.4%

Industrials

8.6%
24.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
15.4%

Energy

3.6%
0.7%

Utilities

2.3%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.2%

Technology

PBUS
35.4%
SPHQ
28.1%

Financial Services

PBUS
11.6%
SPHQ
13.3%

Communication Services

PBUS
11.3%
SPHQ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PBUS
10.1%
SPHQ
4.6%

Healthcare

PBUS
8.6%
SPHQ
8.4%

Industrials

PBUS
8.6%
SPHQ
24.3%

Consumer Defensive

PBUS
4.8%
SPHQ
15.4%

Energy

PBUS
3.6%
SPHQ
0.7%

Utilities

PBUS
2.3%
SPHQ
1.0%

Real Estate

PBUS
1.9%
SPHQ

-

Basic Materials

PBUS
1.8%
SPHQ
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBUS vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBUSSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.62

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

11.17

+2.77

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBUSSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.85

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.89

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.53

+0.26

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBUSSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-57.83%

+24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-8.90%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-16.57%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-25.04%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-10.70%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.08%

-0.09%

Volatility

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) is 2.94%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that PBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBUSSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.49%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

10.18%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

12.62%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.45%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

17.86%

+1.47%

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBUS vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBUS and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.54% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.

PBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.15% for SPHQ.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBUS and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer