PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBUS vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBUS vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.


PBUS

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.14%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBUS vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
10.82%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and QUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.85

The correlation between PBUS and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBUS vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBUS
QUS

Technology

35.4%
26.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
14.6%

Communication Services

11.3%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.4%

Industrials

8.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
9.2%

Energy

3.6%
4.6%

Utilities

2.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.3%

Technology

PBUS
35.4%
QUS
26.3%

Financial Services

PBUS
11.6%
QUS
14.6%

Communication Services

PBUS
11.3%
QUS
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PBUS
10.1%
QUS
5.8%

Healthcare

PBUS
8.6%
QUS
13.4%

Industrials

PBUS
8.6%
QUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

PBUS
4.8%
QUS
9.2%

Energy

PBUS
3.6%
QUS
4.6%

Utilities

PBUS
2.3%
QUS
3.6%

Real Estate

PBUS
1.9%
QUS
1.4%

Basic Materials

PBUS
1.8%
QUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBUS vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBUS vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBUSQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.59

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

11.54

+2.40

PBUS vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBUSQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.95

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.78

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.77

+0.02

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBUSQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-33.78%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-6.85%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-13.94%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-22.30%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.50%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-3.70%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.53%

+0.46%

Volatility

PBUS vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that PBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBUSQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.78%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

6.66%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

9.09%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

14.33%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

16.42%

+2.91%

PBUS vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBUS vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBUS and QUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBUS has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 13.48% vs 11.08% for QUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.

PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.15% for QUS.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBUS and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer