PBUS vs. QQQM
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 13.48%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PBUS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 8.07% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and QQQM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PBUS and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBUS vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBUS
QQQM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBUS
QQQM
Financial Services
PBUS
QQQM
Communication Services
PBUS
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PBUS
QQQM
Healthcare
PBUS
QQQM
Industrials
PBUS
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
PBUS
QQQM
Energy
PBUS
QQQM
Utilities
PBUS
QQQM
Real Estate
PBUS
QQQM
Basic Materials
PBUS
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
QQQM
PBUS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBUS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.53 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 13.52 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBUS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.65 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.82 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.85 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -35.04% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -11.96% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -22.70% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -35.04% | +9.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.20% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -8.25% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 3.11% | -1.12% |
Volatility
PBUS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) is 2.94%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 4.48% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 12.05% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 15.91% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 22.24% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 22.12% | -2.79% |
PBUS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBUS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PBUS and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer