PBUS vs. BLGR
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for BLGR.
Performance
PBUS vs. BLGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PBUS having a 10.82% return and BLGR slightly lower at 10.51%.
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BLGR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS vs. BLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 14.06% |
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF | 10.51% | 16.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and BLGR is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
PBUS vs. BLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBUS
BLGR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBUS
BLGR
Financial Services
PBUS
BLGR
Communication Services
PBUS
BLGR
Consumer Cyclical
PBUS
BLGR
Healthcare
PBUS
BLGR
Industrials
PBUS
BLGR
Consumer Defensive
PBUS
BLGR
Energy
PBUS
BLGR
Utilities
PBUS
BLGR
Real Estate
PBUS
BLGR
Basic Materials
PBUS
BLGR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. BLGR — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
BLGR
PBUS vs. BLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBUS | BLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBUS | BLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.96 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. BLGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than BLGR's maximum drawdown of -14.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and BLGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | BLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -14.08% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.23% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -2.43% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility
PBUS vs. BLGR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | BLGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 15.41% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 15.41% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 15.41% | +3.92% |
PBUS vs. BLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BLGR's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBUS vs. BLGR - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than BLGR's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PBUS and BLGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BLGR.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.23% for BLGR.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.24% for BLGR.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and BLGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer