PBE vs. SCHG
PBE (Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX), while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBE returned 8.90%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for SCHG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
PBE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBE achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PBE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.90%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
PBE
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 34.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
SCHG
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
PBE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 3.32% | 24.84% | 1.10% | 3.71% | -10.83% | 1.54% | 25.66% | 18.65% | -0.19% | 22.28% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 5.03% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBE and SCHG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PBE and SCHG has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PBE vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBE
SCHG
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PBE
SCHG
Financial Services
PBE
SCHG
Basic Materials
PBE
-
SCHG
Communication Services
PBE
-
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
PBE
-
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
PBE
-
SCHG
Energy
PBE
-
SCHG
Industrials
PBE
-
SCHG
Real Estate
PBE
-
SCHG
Technology
PBE
-
SCHG
Utilities
PBE
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
PBE
SCHG
PBE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.42 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 4.68 | +3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.69% | -34.59% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -16.41% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | -23.39% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.71% | -34.59% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.84% | -34.59% | -3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -3.06% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -5.20% | -11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.97% | -0.80% |
Volatility
PBE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.59%. This indicates that PBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.59% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 12.52% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.01% | 16.09% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 22.35% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.91% | 21.60% | +3.31% |
PBE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
PBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 1.02% | 1.00% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 0.38% | 1.12% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBE has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBE dropped -45.69% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.85% vs 8.90% for PBE. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PBE.
PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
PBE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX), while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PBE and 0.04% for SCHG.
PBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer