PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBE vs. ARKG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBE vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBE achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 33.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PBE having a 8.19% annualized return and ARKG not far ahead at 8.25%.


PBE

1D
-1.64%
1M
-2.64%
6M
10.64%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
39.36%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
8.19%
ALL TIME*
9.16%

ARKG

1D
-1.78%
1M
-10.14%
6M
26.72%
YTD
33.10%
1Y
63.67%
3Y*
1.35%
5Y*
-14.38%
10Y*
8.25%
ALL TIME*
6.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$92.48M$118.08M$121.77M
$494.21K$657.50K$547.45K

PBE vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
10.26%24.84%1.10%3.71%-10.83%1.54%25.66%18.65%-0.19%22.28%
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
33.10%23.04%-28.24%16.22%-53.90%-33.92%180.40%44.00%-1.26%46.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PBE and ARKG is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014

0.77

The correlation between PBE and ARKG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBE vs. ARKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBE
ARKG

Healthcare

100.0%
97.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PBE
100.0%
ARKG
97.3%

Financial Services

PBE
0.1%
ARKG
0.9%

Basic Materials

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Communication Services

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Consumer Cyclical

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Consumer Defensive

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Energy

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Industrials

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Real Estate

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Technology

PBE

-

ARKG
2.0%

Utilities

PBE

-

ARKG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBE vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBE
PBE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKG
ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBE vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBEARKGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.26

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

5.42

+4.16

PBE vs. ARKG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ARKG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBE and ARKG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBE vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBE and ARKG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBEARKGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.69%

-83.59%

+37.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-27.51%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-46.45%

+24.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.71%

-79.26%

+44.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.84%

-83.59%

+45.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-65.50%

+61.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.13%

-36.27%

+20.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

11.46%

-7.28%

Volatility

PBE vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) is 5.60%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that PBE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBEARKGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

10.47%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

31.28%

-17.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

43.11%

-24.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

46.17%

-23.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.73%

41.44%

-16.71%

PBE vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBE vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

PBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.85%3.14%0.82%1.34%0.00%0.00%
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
1.73%1.00%0.05%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.38%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBE and ARKG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKG has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to PBE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBE dropped -45.69% vs ARKG's -83.59%.

On 10-year performance, ARKG leads with 8.25% vs 8.19% for PBE. On fees, PBE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PBE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKG has performed better with a 8.25% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.

PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PBE and 0.75% for ARKG.

PBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBE and ARKG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer