PBE vs. PJP
PBE (Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Invesco - PBE tracks the Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX) while PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBE returned 9.44%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for PJP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
PBE vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBE achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than PJP's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PBE has outperformed PJP with an annualized return of 9.44%, while PJP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
PBE
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
PJP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 44.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
PBE vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 5.12% | 24.84% | 1.10% | 3.71% | -10.83% | 1.54% | 25.66% | 18.65% | -0.19% | 22.28% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 9.74% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBE and PJP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PBE and PJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBE vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBE
PJP
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PBE
PJP
Financial Services
PBE
PJP
Basic Materials
PBE
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
PBE
-
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PBE
-
PJP
-
Consumer Defensive
PBE
-
PJP
-
Energy
PBE
-
PJP
-
Industrials
PBE
-
PJP
-
Real Estate
PBE
-
PJP
-
Technology
PBE
-
PJP
-
Utilities
PBE
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBE vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
PBE
PJP
PBE vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBE | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.75 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 15.06 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBE vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than PJP's maximum drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBE and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBE | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.69% | -37.06% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -9.44% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | -16.27% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.71% | -17.51% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.84% | -33.95% | -3.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.20% | -8.83% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.97% | +1.20% |
Volatility
PBE vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBE | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 5.39% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | 12.46% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 16.58% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 16.20% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 18.37% | +6.47% |
PBE vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBE vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
PBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than PJP's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 1.81% | 1.00% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 0.38% | 1.12% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBE and PJP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBE has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to PJP (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBE dropped -45.69% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 10-year performance, PBE leads with 9.44% vs 7.44% for PJP. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PBE has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PBE.
PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.93% for PJP.
PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX), while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PBE and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBE and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer