PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PBD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.75%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


PBD

1D
-0.26%
1M
-9.06%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
8.20%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
-8.16%
10Y*
6.75%
ALL TIME*
-0.46%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$950.09K$971.83K$1.21M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

PBD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
8.20%43.65%-26.39%-10.69%-29.70%-22.30%145.46%40.00%-19.32%28.72%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD and VOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.70

The correlation between PBD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBD
VOO

Industrials

44.6%
8.5%

Technology

19.5%
38.6%

Utilities

16.9%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
9.5%

Energy

7.4%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

1.5%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.5%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Industrials

PBD
44.6%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

PBD
19.5%
VOO
38.6%

Utilities

PBD
16.9%
VOO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PBD
12.7%
VOO
9.5%

Energy

PBD
7.4%
VOO
3.0%

Basic Materials

PBD
4.0%
VOO
1.7%

Financial Services

PBD
1.5%
VOO
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

PBD
0.9%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

PBD

-

VOO
9.9%

Healthcare

PBD

-

VOO
8.9%

Real Estate

PBD

-

VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBD
PBD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.21

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

9.44

-4.94

PBD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-33.99%

-44.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.18%

-8.90%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.69%

-18.69%

-30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.15%

-24.52%

-44.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.40%

-33.99%

-41.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.36%

-1.38%

-50.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.34%

-3.67%

-49.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

2.08%

+5.05%

Volatility

PBD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

3.54%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.91%

10.10%

+10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.04%

12.82%

+13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.77%

16.93%

+11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

18.01%

+9.40%

PBD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
1.76%2.71%1.81%2.85%2.98%0.67%0.48%1.83%1.86%1.76%2.04%1.24%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBD and VOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBD has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.14% vs 6.75% for PBD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

PBD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer