PBD vs. TDV
PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while TDV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBD returned -3.25%/yr vs 14.36%/yr for TDV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
PBD vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 39.81% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 23.61% return.
PBD
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 39.81%
- 6M
- 41.76%
- 1Y
- 96.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
TDV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 10.43%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 23.27%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.36%
- 10Y*
- —
PBD vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 39.81% | 43.65% | -26.39% | -10.69% | -29.70% | -22.30% | 145.46% | 12.57% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 23.61% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBD and TDV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PBD and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBD vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBD
TDV
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PBD
TDV
Energy
PBD
TDV
-
Utilities
PBD
TDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PBD
TDV
-
Technology
PBD
TDV
Basic Materials
PBD
TDV
-
Financial Services
PBD
TDV
Consumer Defensive
PBD
TDV
-
Communication Services
PBD
-
TDV
-
Healthcare
PBD
-
TDV
-
Real Estate
PBD
-
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBD vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
PBD
TDV
PBD vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.17 | 2.25 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.82 | 3.01 | +1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.38 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.03 | 4.11 | +4.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.22 | 14.24 | +13.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17 | 2.25 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.71 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.76 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
PBD vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -32.78% | -45.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -9.55% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.45% | -22.51% | -29.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.15% | -25.11% | -44.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.44% | 0.00% | -38.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.40% | -5.36% | -48.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.76% | +0.67% |
Volatility
PBD vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.01%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBD | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 5.01% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | 12.71% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 17.28% | +6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 20.46% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.26% | 23.21% | +4.05% |
PBD vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBD vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than TDV's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.61% | 2.71% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.04% | 1.24% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.93% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBD and TDV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBD has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to TDV (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 14.36% vs -3.25% for PBD. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 14.36% return vs -3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.
PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.93% for TDV.
PBD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while TDV is Technology Equities. PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 0.66% for TDV.
PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBD and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer