PBD vs. PBW
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW).
PBD and PBW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2007. PBW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both PBD and PBW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PBD or PBW.
Correlation
The correlation between PBD and PBW is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PBD vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PBD:
-0.53
PBW:
-0.28
PBD:
-0.60
PBW:
-0.15
PBD:
0.93
PBW:
0.98
PBD:
-0.18
PBW:
-0.13
PBD:
-1.20
PBW:
-0.61
PBD:
10.73%
PBW:
18.34%
PBD:
24.50%
PBW:
39.33%
PBD:
-78.60%
PBW:
-87.01%
PBD:
-69.08%
PBW:
-83.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PBD has outperformed PBW with an annualized return of 2.12%, while PBW has yielded a comparatively lower 0.58% annualized return.
PBD
0.86%
2.41%
-15.31%
-13.57%
-3.77%
2.12%
PBW
2.60%
6.06%
-3.96%
-10.17%
-9.55%
0.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBD vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PBD vs. PBW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PBD
PBW
PBD vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PBD vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than PBW's 2.77% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.80% | 1.82% | 2.86% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.87% | 1.77% | 2.05% | 1.24% | 1.05% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 2.77% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.89% | 1.27% | 2.69% | 1.54% | 2.96% |
Drawdowns
PBD vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -87.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and PBW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PBD vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is 8.28%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that PBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.