PBD vs. FAN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) and FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - PBD tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index while FAN tracks the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBD returned 6.75%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for FAN. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PBD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FAN.

Performance

PBD vs. FAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than FAN's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PBD has underperformed FAN with an annualized return of 6.75%, while FAN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.

PBD

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -9.06%
• 6M: -1.10%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 1Y: 33.01%
• 3Y*: -1.70%
• 5Y*: -8.16%
• 10Y*: 6.75%
• ALL TIME*: -0.46%

FAN

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -4.47%
• 6M: 5.73%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 1Y: 27.30%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 8.65%
• ALL TIME*: 0.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	$1.50M	$1.70M	$2.53M
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	$950.09K	$971.83K	$1.21M

PBD vs. FAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	8.20%	43.65%	-26.39%	-10.69%	-29.70%	-22.30%	145.46%	40.00%	-19.32%	28.72%
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	16.34%	40.38%	-8.96%	-3.20%	-13.12%	-11.63%	61.16%	31.22%	-11.40%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD and FAN is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008	0.77

The correlation between PBD and FAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBD vs. FAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBD	FAN
Industrials	44.6%	43.3%
Technology	19.5%	-
Utilities	16.9%	53.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	1.6%
Energy	7.4%	0.9%
Basic Materials	4.0%	0.2%
Financial Services	1.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PBD vs. FAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBD

PBD Risk / Return Rank: 45
PBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PBD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PBD Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FAN

FAN Risk / Return Rank: 52
FAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FAN Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FAN Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBD vs. FAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBD	FAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.88	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.23	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	1.86	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	5.79	-1.29

PBD vs. FAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the FAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD and FAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBD vs. FAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FAN drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD and FAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBD	FAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.60%	-79.94%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.18%	-14.64%	-10.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.69%	-24.13%	-24.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.15%	-38.45%	-30.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.40%	-46.29%	-29.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.36%	-12.54%	-39.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.34%	-44.87%	-8.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.13%	4.69%	+2.44%

Volatility

PBD vs. FAN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) at 5.47%. This indicates that PBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBD	FAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	5.47%	+3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.91%	16.12%	+4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.04%	20.57%	+5.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.77%	21.38%	+7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	20.96%	+6.45%

PBD vs. FAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FAN's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBD vs. FAN - Dividend Comparison

PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than FAN's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	0.99%	1.35%	1.52%	1.71%	1.50%	1.79%	0.84%	2.42%	2.67%	2.59%	6.04%	2.35%
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF	1.76%	2.71%	1.81%	2.85%	2.98%	0.67%	0.48%	1.83%	1.86%	1.76%	2.04%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBD and FAN in my portfolio?

PBD and FAN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBD or FAN?

PBD has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to FAN (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBD dropped -78.60% vs FAN's -79.94%.

Which ETF is better, PBD or FAN?

On 10-year performance, FAN leads with 8.65% vs 6.75% for PBD. On fees, FAN is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, FAN has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBD or FAN?

Over the 10-year period, FAN has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBD or FAN?

FAN is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBD or FAN?

PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.99% for FAN.

What is the main difference between PBD and FAN?

PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index, while FAN tracks ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PBD and 0.62% for FAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.