PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PB vs. XLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PB vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PB achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PB has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 6.46%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.


PB

1D
0.58%
1M
5.70%
YTD
4.83%
6M
1.50%
1Y
8.83%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
6.46%

XLF

1D
-0.89%
1M
4.83%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
-0.93%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PB vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PB
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
4.83%-5.15%15.06%-3.34%3.64%7.13%-0.27%18.19%-9.22%-0.37%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
-1.69%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PB and XLF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.60

The correlation between PB and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PB vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PB
PB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PB vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBXLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

0.56

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

1.44

-0.42

PB vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PB Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PB and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PB vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PB drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PB and XLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBXLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.89%

-82.69%

+34.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.45%

-14.79%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.84%

-15.54%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.37%

-25.81%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.24%

-42.86%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.29%

-4.53%

-6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-20.00%

+9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.64%

5.78%

+2.86%

Volatility

PB vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.20%. This indicates that PB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBXLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.20%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.60%

11.25%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.98%

14.60%

+8.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

18.59%

+6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.77%

22.17%

+8.60%

Dividends

PB vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

PB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than XLF's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PB
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
3.34%3.39%3.00%3.26%2.90%2.75%2.70%2.35%2.39%1.97%1.73%2.33%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.48%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


PB and XLF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PB has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to XLF (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PB dropped -47.89% vs XLF's -82.69%.

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PB and XLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer