PAVE vs. VGT
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 20.35%/yr for VGT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
PAVE vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
PAVE vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and VGT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PAVE and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAVE vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
VGT
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PAVE
VGT
Basic Materials
PAVE
VGT
Utilities
PAVE
VGT
-
Technology
PAVE
VGT
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
VGT
-
Energy
PAVE
VGT
Communication Services
PAVE
-
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
VGT
Financial Services
PAVE
-
VGT
Healthcare
PAVE
-
VGT
Real Estate
PAVE
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
VGT
PAVE vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.94 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 9.11 | +2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -54.63% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -16.40% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -27.23% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -35.07% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -7.18% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -7.95% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 5.28% | -2.01% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.35%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 10.00% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 18.00% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 22.00% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 25.40% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 24.72% | -0.32% |
PAVE vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAVE vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and VGT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 20.35% vs 17.84% for PAVE. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 17.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer