PAVE vs. RSPS
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RSPS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPS.
Performance
PAVE vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than RSPS's 7.30% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
PAVE vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.30% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and RSPS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between PAVE and RSPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAVE vs. RSPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
RSPS
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PAVE
RSPS
-
Basic Materials
PAVE
RSPS
-
Utilities
PAVE
RSPS
-
Technology
PAVE
RSPS
-
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
RSPS
Energy
PAVE
RSPS
-
Communication Services
PAVE
-
RSPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
RSPS
Financial Services
PAVE
-
RSPS
Healthcare
PAVE
-
RSPS
-
Real Estate
PAVE
-
RSPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
RSPS
PAVE vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.07 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 0.42 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 0.77 | +10.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than RSPS's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and RSPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -35.93% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -11.72% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -16.53% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -18.61% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -6.32% | +5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -5.05% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 6.29% | -3.02% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) at 4.33%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 4.33% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 10.48% | +5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 13.78% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 13.65% | +8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 14.89% | +9.51% |
PAVE vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAVE vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than RSPS's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and RSPS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to RSPS (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs RSPS's -35.93%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.84% vs 1.38% for RSPS. On fees, RSPS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 1.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RSPS is Consumer Staples Equities. PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.40% for RSPS.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and RSPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer