PAUG vs. FNDB
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB).
PAUG and FNDB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAUG is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019. FNDB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI US. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013. Both PAUG and FNDB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAUG or FNDB.
Performance
PAUG vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 22.67% return.
PAUG
15.46%
1.45%
7.03%
19.21%
8.71%
N/A
FNDB
22.67%
4.00%
14.20%
32.47%
18.15%
14.50%
Key characteristics
| PAUG | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.08 | 2.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.34 | 3.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.65 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.64 | 5.02 |
| Martin Ratio | 27.62 | 18.38 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.70% | 1.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.25% | 11.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.88% | -38.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.13% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAUG vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PAUG and FNDB is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAUG vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAUG vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 4.86% | 3.73% | 4.93% | 3.31% | 6.45% | 3.21% | 4.63% | 3.92% | 4.16% | 3.43% | 4.12% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
PAUG vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and FNDB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAUG vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 1.79%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.