PAUG vs. BAUG
PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) and BAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PAUG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index while BAUG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAUG returned 9.17%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for BAUG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PAUG vs. BAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than BAUG's 6.52% return.
PAUG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
BAUG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 19.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- —
PAUG vs. BAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 4.92% | 12.34% | 15.37% | 17.71% | -6.85% | 7.58% | 9.82% | 4.30% |
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 6.52% | 14.81% | 21.15% | 20.11% | -10.30% | 12.06% | 12.20% | 6.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAUG and BAUG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PAUG and BAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
PAUG vs. BAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAUG
BAUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PAUG
BAUG
Financial Services
PAUG
BAUG
Communication Services
PAUG
BAUG
Consumer Cyclical
PAUG
BAUG
Healthcare
PAUG
BAUG
Industrials
PAUG
BAUG
Consumer Defensive
PAUG
BAUG
Energy
PAUG
BAUG
Utilities
PAUG
BAUG
Real Estate
PAUG
BAUG
Basic Materials
PAUG
BAUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAUG vs. BAUG — Risk / Return Rank
PAUG
BAUG
PAUG vs. BAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAUG | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.69 | 2.55 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.99 | 3.68 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.50 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 3.50 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.75 | 17.76 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAUG | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.55 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.96 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.84 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
PAUG vs. BAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum BAUG drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and BAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAUG | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -24.19% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -5.66% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.45% | -13.78% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.76% | -15.59% | +3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.07% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -2.84% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.11% | -0.39% |
Volatility
PAUG vs. BAUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 0.58%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (BAUG) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAUG | BAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 1.00% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 5.83% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.60% | 7.79% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.71% | 11.70% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 13.95% | -3.35% |
PAUG vs. BAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAUG and BAUG have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PAUG vs. BAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAUG nor BAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PAUG and BAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BAUG has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to PAUG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAUG dropped -17.88% vs BAUG's -24.19%.
On 5-year performance, BAUG leads with 11.16% vs 9.17% for PAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BAUG has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAUG and BAUG have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PAUG and BAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while BAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August.
PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAUG and BAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer