PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAUG vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAUG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 8.88% return.


PAUG

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.33%
YTD
4.86%
6M
4.63%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.77%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAUG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
4.86%12.34%15.37%17.71%-6.85%7.58%9.82%3.60%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
8.88%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PAUG and SCHB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.92

The correlation between PAUG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAUG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAUG
SCHB

Technology

38.4%
37.3%

Financial Services

11.0%
11.4%

Communication Services

10.8%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.8%

Industrials

7.9%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.3%

Energy

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.9%

Technology

PAUG
38.4%
SCHB
37.3%

Financial Services

PAUG
11.0%
SCHB
11.4%

Communication Services

PAUG
10.8%
SCHB
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PAUG
10.0%
SCHB
9.8%

Healthcare

PAUG
8.4%
SCHB
8.8%

Industrials

PAUG
7.9%
SCHB
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

PAUG
4.6%
SCHB
4.3%

Energy

PAUG
3.2%
SCHB
3.3%

Utilities

PAUG
2.1%
SCHB
2.1%

Real Estate

PAUG
1.8%
SCHB
2.3%

Basic Materials

PAUG
1.7%
SCHB
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAUG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAUG
PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAUG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAUGSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.72

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.61

12.04

+7.56

PAUG vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAUG and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAUG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAUGSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-35.27%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-8.91%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.45%

-19.34%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-25.41%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-2.86%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-4.11%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

2.01%

-1.29%

Volatility

PAUG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 1.05%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAUGSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

5.00%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

10.09%

-5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

12.83%

-7.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.72%

17.35%

-8.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

18.34%

-7.78%

PAUG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAUG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PAUG and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHB has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to PAUG (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAUG dropped -17.88% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 11.98% vs 9.10% for PAUG. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAUG.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for PAUG.

PAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PAUG and 0.03% for SCHB.

PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAUG and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer