PAMC vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - PAMC tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

PAMC vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PAMC

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 11.11%
• YTD: 15.63%
• 1Y: 25.97%
• 3Y*: 15.21%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.20%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	$146.26K	$127.92K	$342.42K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PAMC vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	9.41%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

PAMC vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAMC	QQQN
Industrials	23.2%	8.7%
Financial Services	19.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	13.7%
Technology	10.8%	47.3%
Energy	7.8%	-
Real Estate	6.8%	-
Healthcare	5.8%	19.9%
Basic Materials	5.5%	1.9%
Utilities	3.5%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	1.4%
Communication Services	0.8%	5.5%

Return for Risk

PAMC vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAMC vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAMC	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	—	—

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAMC	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	0.00%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	0.00%	-3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.32%	0.00%	-7.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PAMC	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	0.00%	+18.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	0.00%	+20.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	0.00%	+20.62%

PAMC vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAMC vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.12%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PAMC or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAMC or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAMC or QQQN?

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between PAMC and QQQN?

PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.18% for QQQN.